Why Do We Not Protest Soaring Cancer Projections?

 

“It would appear that men around the world are being targeted at an alarming rate, which seems to be a death threat to humanity.”

 

In today’s world it seems that everything not fitting with the various agendas is being protested, yet when cancer projections are given, doubling for men by 2050, it is just accepted. I am sure if they made it more personal, that in 26 years you will come down with a deadly disease, people would react but if it is not specific to them, they do not see the threat, even when it is obvious. According to this new study published in the medical journal Cancer “[b]etween 2022 and 2050, cancer cases are projected to increase from 10.3 million to 19 million (≥84%). Deaths are projected to increase from 5.4 million to 10.5 million (≥93%), with a greater than two-fold increase among men aged 65 years and older (≥117%) and for low-Human Development Index (HDI) and medium-HDI countries/territories (≥160%). Cancer cases and deaths are projected to increase among working-age groups (≥39%) and very-high-HDI countries/territories (≥50%).”[1] This to me is a death sentence, how else would you interpret it?

What changed in the past four years that is so concrete that such bold predictions can be given? I was given the shocking news that a long-time friend of mine had died last week from cancer. I recall that he broke to me the news when we had dinner together last April. He said he was quite shocked, he thought he was doing everything right, he watched his diet, got plenty of exercise and was not highly stressed but out of nowhere he was diagnosed with terminal cancer. He said, “I have come to accept my fate, after all at 72 years of age I lived a full life.”  I responded and said 72 years is not a full life, people are living now to 100. I offered my help to fight this outcome, but he gave in to the death sentence and gave up.

Cancer and COVID

According to the Cancer study mentioned above, “[b]etween 2022 and 2050, the cancer type with the highest estimated increase is projected to be mesothelioma for incident cases (105.5% increase from 2022) and prostate cancer for deaths (136.4% increase).”[2] Mesothelioma, according to the American Lung Association, “is a rare type of cancer that develops in the thin layer of tissue that covers most of your internal organs, called the mesothelium, the most common form occurs in the lining of the lungs.”[3] This form of cancer is not typical, yet today it is very prevalent. What would cause a thin layer to cover most of internal organs? I know when I use liposomes in a few of our products it allows the formula to be delivered specifically where directed. In the drug world they used lipid nanoparticles in the COVID-19 jabs.

A 2021 study in the Journal of Clinical Oncology revealed a stark gender disparity in global cancer rates. While men experienced a 19% higher incidence of cancer compared to women in 2020, the mortality gap was even more pronounced, with men facing a 43% higher death rate from the disease.[4] It would appear that men around the world are being targeted at an alarming rate, which seems to be a death threat to humanity.

Unexplained deaths became quite prevalent in the last four years and now patients who have cancer or other unnamed diseases are being given a diagnosis that what they have is long COVID. It is long, alright, it has been going on for 4 years. Now men die from cancer at near double the rate and women are given the diagnosis of long COVID, and pregnant women at that. According to a study published in the journal Obstetrics & Gynecology, nearly 1 in 10 pregnant women got long COVID after acute COVID-19 during pregnancy.[5] I would like to see them go one step further in their research to distinguish how many of these pregnant women took the jab and how many did not. I wonder why it is never being presented when they release their studies or articles, the elephant is in the room but let’s pretend that it isn’t.

Recently I was contacted by Health Canada in regards to one of the ingredients in one of our formulations, it was for the herbal product chasteberry. It so happens that—after decades of safe use for preventing miscarriages, increasing lactation for pregnant women, symptoms of premenstrual syndrome, breast pain associated with the menstrual cycle, infertility, and other conditions—a new study now believes that during pregnancy or while breastfeeding it may not be safe. I find that to be extremely contradictive: how come it was deemed safe for pregnant women to take an experimental mRNA injection without conducting a safety study—since pregnant women were excluded from the initial clinical trials, so any hard data on their safety and efficacy in this important group has been limited—only deemed safe after the fact? Yet chasteberry that has been used without incident for several decades may not be safe? Someone has some explaining to do.

The European Society of Medicine has published a research article The correlation between Australian Excess Deaths by State and Booster Vaccinations, which “explores the relationship by Australia State between COVID Booster Vaccinations and excess deaths. There is evidence of a very strong correlation in ordinary least squares regression analysis. Cross-validation tests support the strength of the regression relationship. The results suggest that it would be worthwhile to explore these associations in greater depth as it is an important public health issue.”[6]

Cancer and eating habits

Colorectal cancer incidence and mortality among individuals younger than 50 years (early-onset colorectal cancer) are increasing. “Over the past two to three decades, the incidence of early-onset colorectal cancer has increased at a rate of 1 percent to 2 percent per year, while mortality rates have also increased by 1 percent per year, according to a 2024 American Cancer Society report. Today, colorectal cancer is the leading cause of cancer death in men younger than 50, and it ranks second only to breast cancer in women younger than 50.”[7]

The cause can be linked mostly to our lifestyle—including changing sleep patterns, lack of movement or the widespread use of antibiotics—and dietary choices characterized by high consumption of added sugars and food additives such as preservatives, taste enhancers and dyes. According to a “cohort study of 85 256 women, those with obesity (body mass index ≥30) had a nearly doubled risk of early-onset colorectal cancer compared with women with a body mass index of 18.5 to 22.9. The findings suggest that obesity is associated with an increased risk of early-onset colorectal cancer.”[8]

A high-sugar diet rapidly alters gut microbial composition, promoting the growth of bacteria that thrive on simple sugars while reducing beneficial microbes like Bacteroides and Akkermansia, which are crucial for gut health. This dietary change leads to a decrease in short-chain fatty acids, essential for gut function, resulting in weakened immune and barrier functions, increased gut inflammation, and thinning of the intestinal mucus layer. Additionally, sugar intake fosters harmful bacteria such as Proteobacteria, which carry toxins that further disrupt gut integrity, leading to a decline in overall microbial diversity and exacerbating conditions like colitis. “Consuming large amounts of sugar leads to an increase in stored energy in the form of fat, indirectly raising the risk of colon cancer, said Dr. Jeremy Kortmansky, associate professor of clinical medicine (medical oncology) at Yale School of Medicine.”[9]

Doctor’s Choice Immunity Formulas:

References:

 

 

[1] Bizuayehu, Habtamu Mellie et al. 2024.

[2] Ibid.

[3] American Lung Association. n.a.

[4] Sung, Hyuna et al. 2021.

[5] Metz, Torri et al. 2024.

[6] Allen, D. E. 2024.

[7] Zhao, Flora. 2024.

[8] Liu, Po-Hong et al. 2019.

[9] Zhao, Flora. 2024.